Skip to content

The record moved this year. Nobody can wind a magnet from what moved it.

The search we run for ourselves.

Superconductors are the future.

Everything that moves electricity loses some of it as heat. Below one temperature, that loss does not shrink. It vanishes.

The transition, drawn

Temperature293KResistance. Every wire sheds heat.

One wire, up close

Resistance

0

Move across the field to cool it

Tc
ColdA warm room · 293 K

One wire, seen close, at the temperature on the bar. Warm, its electrons scatter off the shivering lattice and every collision sheds heat. Cool it and they still scatter, until one temperature: then they pair, run straight through, and the resistance is not smaller, it is zero. The curve underneath is that drop. The mark carries no number: the search is for a material whose mark sits above the record.

Everything that moves electricity

Loses nothing between the plant and the plug, at any length, at any current.

Where it stands today, in four numbers

  • 30,000+Medicine

    MRI scanners installed, nearly all of them a magnet in a bath of liquid helium at 4 K. Take the helium out and the scanner fits a clinic, an ambulance, a field hospital.

  • 1,232Science

    superconducting dipoles hold the beam at 1.9 K inside the largest cryogenic system on Earth. Every fusion reactor on a drawing board is built around the same kind of magnet, and warmer means smaller and cheaper at every scale.

  • 603Transport

    km/h, the fastest a train has ever run, on magnets riding at 4 K in liquid helium. The cold is the weight, the cost and the reason there is one line.

  • 5%The grid

    of the electricity the United States moves on its grid is lost in the wires. A superconducting line loses almost none of it and carries several times the power in the same trench.

How we beat the giants

Bypassing the compute bottleneck.

Trillions of possible compositions. One sweep.

Schematic

Legacy brute-force compute

Full physics, one candidate at a time.

A hyperscaler's compute, spent

AI-native MEL pipeline

The critical variables, screened in parallel.

Ours

A schematic, not a benchmark: the same sweep, priced two ways. Cell by cell against the whole problem, or the crowding first.

A schematic comparison. On the left, a grid of cells is evaluated one cell at a time, and after six seconds the scan has covered about a seventh of the first two rows. On the right, a stream of candidates converges on a narrow gate over the same six seconds; most deflect away and fade, and the few that pass fill an output column completely. A progress rail under each panel shows how far each got: the right one full, the left one a sliver. The play holds for four seconds and runs again.

  1. 01

    The problem

    The search below is a compute problem before it is a physics problem, and the labs with the most compute are expected to win it. We are not going to out-spend them, so we changed what has to be computed.

  2. 02

    What we changed

    The Modulated Electron Lattice (MEL) framework was written for machines from its first line rather than ported to a GPU after the fact. It isolates the few variables that decide whether a material superconducts, local electron crowding first among them, and hands the model exactly those, at a fraction of the compute a brute-force sweep burns.

  3. 03

    Why the gap widens

    Which is how a company without a hyperscaler's budget sweeps the whole space, and why the gap keeps widening: every bench result that comes home trains the model, so each sweep starts sharper than the last.

Independently validated

Phys. Rev. Lett.2026

The effect the model ranks on was measured independently at Stanford and SLAC.

Superconductivity reinforces charge-density-wave phase coherence across cuprates

The search we run for ourselves.

Trillions of possible materials. One worth the century.

Discovery runs here from day one. The same model that answers a device team's brief is pointed at the band above the record, and every program and every bench result sharpens it.

The scene opens on the highest transition temperature anyone has measured at ambient pressure, plotted against the year it was first reported, from mercury at 4.2 kelvin in 1911 to Hg-1223 at 135 kelvin in 1993. It does not move again for thirty-three years. In 2026 a pressure-quenched phase of that same compound reached 151 kelvin at ambient pressure, and it survives about three days at 77 kelvin. The empty band between the record and a warm room fills with points, and those points become the model: our model of superconductivity, built on the MEL framework, pointed at the band it has just drawn. The target is the material the field has waited a century for. The space gathers round the model out of the dark, trillions of possibilities, and the model sweeps it in rings from the model outward, each ring one constraint, bypassing the compute the search would otherwise cost; what a ring takes ignites and falls away. Six of the constraints are shown: whether the material forms a phase at all, whether it is stable at one atmosphere, whether it carries current at the field the brief asks for, whether a synthesis route exists, what it costs per kiloamp metre, and whether it holds up in length. Everything the search keeps is new. What survives is made with our partners: Brookhaven National Laboratory, the Walther-Meissner-Institut, UC Berkeley, CAN Superconductors and Eloi Materials. Nobody at SuperMatics then measures any of it. Most of the measurement runs at the bench that made the sample, at UC Berkeley and CAN Superconductors, and the hardest of it at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign and at Georgia Tech. Every result, on spec or not, returns to the model.

Built with the people who know

You cannot teach a model their intuition. So they work with it.

The physics was written here

The framework the model runs on has one author on the team and two decades behind it. The people who wrote it decide what it searches.

The measurers publish under their own names

Crystal growers and scanning tunneling groups whose careers are the intuition a model cannot be taught. They work with it, hand in hand.

Every result comes home

Hit or miss, with the conditions it was taken under. The journals only print what worked; the misses are ours, and the next search starts from them.

Whoever finds it holds the most valuable material of the century.

We are searching for it, and we are paid on the way.

$10T+ / yr

of systems built on a superconductor are waiting for it

If it is found elsewhere first, whoever found it still has to make it work in a magnet, a chip and a cable, and that is our platform. Either way, the upside runs through here.

Superconductors are the future of the magnets, the chips, the cables and the grid. That future is capped by one number, how cold, and the company that moves it gets paid by all of them.

Read the narration

For centuries, human progress has been measured by our struggle against resistance. Every machine we build pays a heavy tax to nature in the form of heat. But deep within the quantum world, there exists a hidden loophole, a state of absolute physical perfection.

When the temperature falls, the rules of reality change. Electrons move in perfect unison, without collision, without loss. This is a glimpse into a frictionless future.

It holds the power to reshape our cities, propel us into the air, and contain the fire of stars. The age of fighting nature is over. We are stepping into the era of perfect efficiency.

The only challenge left is discovering the exact material to unlock it.