Article
What is a Josephson junction and how does it work?
A Josephson junction is a weak link between superconductors that allows a supercurrent to flow through it, as Josephson described in Physics Letters [1]. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) explains that the junction's behavior depends on the quantum phase difference across the link, connecting superconducting current, voltage, and frequency [2].
- Published
- Reading time
- 4 min
- Cited
- 6 sources
What is the Josephson effect?
In a classic tunnel junction, superconducting electrodes are separated by a thin insulating barrier through which Cooper pairs can tunnel, as Josephson's original Physics Letters paper proposed [1]. The surprising result is that a supercurrent can flow across the junction without a voltage across it, within a limit set by the junction [1]. That is the direct-current Josephson effect, not ordinary current flowing through a metal contact [1].
Josephson also predicted a time-varying current when a constant voltage is applied across the junction [1]. NIST explains that the voltage determines how quickly the relative quantum phase changes, so the oscillation frequency is proportional to the voltage [2]. These effects describe the junction as a quantum element inside an electrical circuit, rather than suggesting that any insulating gap will behave this way [1][2].
How do Cooper pairs and phase produce a supercurrent?
NIST describes the electrodes using macroscopic wavefunctions associated with the superconducting Cooper-pair condensates on either side of the barrier [2]. Their phase difference is the relevant circuit variable, and Josephson's Physics Letters analysis relates that phase to the supercurrent through the weak link [1][2]. The barrier reduces the coupling between the superconductors while still allowing quantum tunneling, according to Physics Letters [1]. NIST notes that this phase difference is periodic, so a complete cycle returns the phase to an equivalent value [2].
The current-phase relation is nonlinear, rather than the straight-line relationship of an ordinary resistor, in Josephson's treatment [1]. Physics Letters describes a maximum supercurrent supported by a junction, known as its critical current, beyond which the zero-voltage branch no longer describes the response [1]. The detailed response also depends on the surrounding circuit and bias, as NIST's discussion of operating ranges makes clear [2]. NIST's voltage-standard examples show why the junction cannot be specified independently of the signal that drives it and the range in which it is operated [2].
How are Josephson voltage and frequency related?
NIST gives the Josephson frequency as f = (2e/h)V, where V is the junction voltage, e is the elementary charge, and h is Planck's constant [2]. The equation relates frequency and voltage; it does not mean that a bare junction automatically produces an accurate voltage reference under arbitrary conditions [2]. NIST explains that a junction can instead be locked to an external microwave signal over a suitable operating range [2].
When the junction is correctly locked, NIST describes quantized voltage pulses and voltage steps that can be used in a standard [2]. NIST's account of the International System of Units explains that the elementary charge and Planck constant have fixed numerical values in the revised SI [3]. The Josephson constant follows from their ratio, so a properly operated standard connects an electrical measurement to frequency and those defined constants [2][3].
How do Josephson voltage standards work?
NIST describes programmable voltage standards that use arrays of Josephson junctions and an applied microwave signal to produce accurately known voltages [2]. The array is important because, as NIST explains, the contributions of junctions can be combined to obtain practical signal levels [2]. NIST also describes waveform synthesizers that control sequences of quantized pulses to generate alternating signals [2]. In the NIST account, the pulse area is tied to the fundamental constants when the phase advances through a complete cycle [2].
NIST emphasizes that correct operation requires a characterized quantum-locking range: a stable-looking voltage outside that range is not sufficient evidence of an accurate standard [2]. NIST identifies bias current, microwave power, and operating temperature as conditions that must be kept in the appropriate range [2]. NIST's examples map those operating ranges rather than relying only on a voltage remaining steady over time [2]. The distinction helps a calibration laboratory separate a reproducible output from one with the intended quantum accuracy [2].
Why are Josephson junctions used in qubits?
In the transmon design, the nonlinearity supplied by Josephson coupling helps create distinguishable energy transitions, as the original transmon analysis explains [4]. A circuit with evenly spaced energy levels would be harder to address selectively as a qubit, whereas the transmon retains sufficient anharmonicity for control in the proposed operating regime [4]. The companion article on superconducting qubits explores the broader processor and coherence context; this explanation focuses on the junction itself.
The original transmon paper describes increasing the ratio of Josephson energy to charging energy to reduce sensitivity to charge noise while retaining useful anharmonicity [4]. A Nature Communications experiment illustrates a specific materials implementation: its transmon uses tantalum capacitor structures and aluminum-based junctions with an oxide barrier [5]. In that experiment, researchers patterned the capacitor separately from the small junction, illustrating how the weak link and the larger circuit elements have distinct fabrication roles [5]. The range of designs discussed in the original transmon paper and the Nature Communications experiment does not imply that all superconducting qubits use the same materials or fabrication [4][5].
What is the connection between junctions and SQUIDs?
NIST describes a superconducting quantum interference device, or SQUID, as a superconducting loop with insulating barriers in which current paths interfere in response to magnetic fields [6]. The interference makes the device sensitive to changes in magnetic flux through the loop [6]. This is a different use of junction physics from the microwave-driven voltage standard or the nonlinear qubit circuit [2][4][6].
NIST describes SQUID applications including measurements of weak magnetic signals from the body and readout of other cryogenic sensors [6]. NIST also notes that SQUIDs require refrigeration, which affects how the instrument is deployed [6]. Comparing a SQUID, voltage standard, and transmon shows why the same underlying weak-link effect can support sensing, metrology, and quantum information, with different surrounding circuits and operating requirements [2][4][6].
Sources
- Possible new effects in superconductive tunnellingPhysics Letters, 1962
- Quantum Locking RangesNIST
- The International System of Units: Appendix 1NIST
- Charge insensitive qubit design derived from the Cooper pair boxPhysical Review A, arXiv, 2007
- New material platform for superconducting transmon qubits with coherence times exceeding 0.3 millisecondsNature Communications, 2021
- Sensors for a Magnetic WorldNIST
SuperMatics: AI built for superconductors.